Radiometric dating answers bisexual black women dating service

19-Oct-2019 01:18

They instead use selected radioactivity results to confirm what they need to see.As discussed in previous chapters, this viewpoint, being secular, contradicts God’s stated Word in Genesis and even the Ten Commandments, where He wrote with His own hand that He created the heavens, Earth, sea, and all that is in them in six days (Exodus ).Therefore, since sedimentary rock is the only kind of rock that bears fossils, a relative date is estimated by the position of a sedimentary rock in relation to an igneous outflow.There is a discussion of a few examples of radiometric methods with sedimentary rocks in Creationists believe that the assumptions of radiometric dating are invalid and cannot be proven.If these assumptions that underlie radiometric dating are not true, then the entire theory falls flat, like a chair without its four legs.The second fatal flaw clearly reveals that at least one of those assumptions must actually be wrong because radiometric dating . Helens, we watched rocks being formed in the 1980s, but when sent to a laboratory 10 years later for dating, the 10-year-old rocks returned ages of hundreds of thousands to millions of years.In any event, radiometric dating doesn’t disprove the Bible.

This kind of data could have shown that the Earth is young.We believe that since evolutionists expect certain rocks to yield dates that agree with their theory, no laboratory will publish dates that are wildly out of whack, or they wouldn’t get paid for producing a result that would be hotly contested as experimental error.Woodmorappe shows that even the published results are enough to render the method as unreliable. John Woodmorappe’s books are advertised elsewhere on my web site.These books contain an exhaustive study of radiometric dates that do not fit the results evolutionists expect.

This kind of data could have shown that the Earth is young.We believe that since evolutionists expect certain rocks to yield dates that agree with their theory, no laboratory will publish dates that are wildly out of whack, or they wouldn’t get paid for producing a result that would be hotly contested as experimental error.Woodmorappe shows that even the published results are enough to render the method as unreliable. John Woodmorappe’s books are advertised elsewhere on my web site.These books contain an exhaustive study of radiometric dates that do not fit the results evolutionists expect.After all, plenty of assumptions go into the calculations, as we’ll discuss in this chapter.